ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
HER2 overexpression/amplification in colorectal cancer: spatial intratumoral heterogeneity as a key determinant of detection discordance and therapy response.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
HER2-targeted therapy is increasingly used in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, discrepancies between conventional detection methods (immunohistochemistry [IHC]/fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH]) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) remain to be elucidated. Furthermore, the impact of spatial intratumoral heterogeneity (SIH) in HER2 overexpression on both the methodological concordance and therapeutic efficacy is still poorly understood. Two consecutive retrospective cohorts from Peking Union Medical College Hospital (2018-2024) were analyzed. In the NGS cohort (n = 1,343), HER2-amplified cases were identified based on NGS-derived gene copy number (GCN), and their clinicopathological and molecular features were characterized using stage-matched HER2-non-amplified controls. In the IHC cohort (n = 3,585), spatial HER2 expression heterogeneity was comprehensively assessed. Finally, treatment outcomes were reviewed in four HER2-amplified patients who received anti-HER2 therapy. HER2 amplification was detected in 2.53% (34/1,343) of tumors and defined a distinct molecular subset characterized by fewer RAS/KRAS mutations and more frequent CDK12 and TP53 alterations. Concordance between NGS and IHC was higher when applying ToGA criteria (κ = 0.85) compared to the HERACLES criteria, particularly in cases with high-level amplifications (GCN ≥ 10). Notably, intrablock heterogeneity accounted for 82% of discordant cases, underscoring a major biological source of testing variability. In the IHC cohort, HER-2 positivity was defined as ≥ 10% 3 + staining or 2 + in IHC with amplification confirmed by FISH. Overall, 1.62% of CRCs were HER2-positive, of which 24.14% exhibited intrablock heterogeneity, and 31.25% demonstrated SIH across tumor blocks or between primary and metastatic sites. Among four patients treated with anti-HER2 therapy, two with relatively limited HER2 expression heterogeneity showed sustained CEA decline and stable disease (SD), whereas the two with marked heterogeneity demonstrated fluctuating CEA levels and disease progression, even in the presence of high-level amplification. HER2-amplified/overexpressed CRC constitutes a biologically distinct entity frequently characterized by SIH. This heterogeneity represents a key determinant of inter-method discordance and may influence response to HER2-targeted therapy. These findings support integrating spatial assessment into HER2 testing algorithms and warrant prospective validation of its predictive value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42507169What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.