ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Media multitasking and the aesthetic brain: neural sensitivity to abstraction in the digital age.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human aesthetic preferences are dynamic and evolve over time. In the contemporary era of rapidly advancing media technologies, media multitasking has become increasingly prevalent, exerting profound influences on cognitive functioning. Since aesthetic experience arises from underlying cognitive processes, this study investigates how media multitasking affects individuals' aesthetic processing. Participants classified as heavy (HMM), intermediate (IMM), and light media multitaskers (LMM) assessed the beauty of representational and abstract images. The three groups exhibited distinct neural dynamics during aesthetic processing. Specifically, HMM exhibited a larger P2 amplitude and a smaller N400 amplitude for abstract compared to representational images, indicating heightened sensory processing for abstract images and more semantic retrieval for representational images. Furthermore, HMM showed a larger LPP amplitude for abstract images during both early and middle stages. For IMM, this effect was limited to the early stage, while LMM showed no significant differences across stages. These findings indicate that media multitasking may enhance the aesthetic processing of complex or ambiguous stimuli by facilitating the extraction and evaluation of relevant information. This research contributes to the neurobiological understanding of aesthetics in the media multitasking age and underscores the importance of considering evolving cognitive styles in anticipating future artistic trends.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42507155What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.