Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42507145›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2026

In situ urethroplasty at the time of artificial urinary sphincter explantation for urethral erosion: an 18-year single-center experience.

Chang Rae Park, Jang Hwan Kim, Kyung Tak Oh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chang Rae ParkDepartment of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jang Hwan KimDepartment of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyung Tak OhDepartment of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. okt1226@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3681-6629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe evaluated the outcomes of immediate in situ urethroplasty performed at the time of artificial urinary sphincter explantation for urethral erosion and explored the factors associated with postoperative wound dehiscence. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent artificial urinary sphincter explantation for endoscopically confirmed urethral cuff erosion at a single tertiary referral center between January 2008 and September 2025. Partial erosions were managed using primary repair, whereas circumferential defects were treated using excision and primary anastomosis. The primary outcome was the postoperative urethral stricture-free rate. Secondary outcomes included postoperative wound dehiscence and secondary artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Exploratory subgroup analyses were performed to compare the patients with and without postoperative wound dehiscence.

resultsSixteen patients were included in the study. The median patient age was 76 years, and the median follow-up duration was 14 months. Six patients (37.5%) had prior pelvic radiation therapy and seven (43.8%) had diabetes mellitus. Postoperative urethral stricture occurred in one patient (6.3%), yielding a stricture-free rate of 93.8%. Postoperative wound dehiscence occurred in seven patients (43.8%). All wounds were limited to the subcutaneous tissue and were managed with secondary closure under local anesthesia (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa). Secondary artificial urinary sphincter implantation was performed in seven patients (43.8%), with two patients requiring repeat explantation due to recurrent infection.

conclusionsImmediate in situ urethroplasty at the time of artificial urinary sphincter explantation was associated with a low observed urethral stricture rate in this selected cohort, although interpretation is limited by the small sample size and absence of a comparator group.

Indexed as

Device RemovalPostoperative ComplicationsUrethraUrethral DiseasesUrinary Sphincter, ArtificialAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurgical Wound DehiscenceTime FactorsUrethral StrictureUrologic Surgical Procedures, MaleArtificial urinary sphincter explantationIn situ urethroplastyUrethral erosion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.