Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42507130›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2026

[Suicidal ideation with instrumental components at inpatient psychiatric admission or discharge: clinical, ethical and judicial implications and recommendations for action].

D Schwerthöffer, B Schäfer, U Zimmermann

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

D SchwerthöfferKlinik für Suchtmedizin und Psychotherapie, kbo Isar Amper-Klinikum-Region München, Ringstraße 1, 85540, München, Deutschland. dirk.schwerthoeffer@kbo.de.
B SchäferKlinik für Suchtmedizin und Psychotherapie, kbo Isar Amper-Klinikum-Region München, Ringstraße 1, 85540, München, Deutschland.
U ZimmermannKlinik für Suchtmedizin und Psychotherapie, kbo Isar Amper-Klinikum-Region München, Ringstraße 1, 85540, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatment of patients who report suicidal ideation if they are not admitted as inpatients or discharged from inpatient treatment, raises clinical, judicial and ethical concerns.

methodsEthical discussion based on a case study and practical recommendations for action based on clinical, ethical and judicial aspects and selective literature search. RESULTS AND

conclusionSuicidal statements of patients can have instrumental components. Suicidal ideation with instrumental components (Swic) can be associated with impulsive actions. Even though risk assessment in Swic may not be reliably achievable, there are clinical indicators for assessing the instrumental components of suicidal ideation. A differentiated ethical analysis can broaden the clinical perspective in treating patients with Swic. Communication with patients with Swic should be empathetic, clear and transparent and must be linked with concrete offers of support. The documentation of the treatment for patients with Swic who are not admitted for inpatient treatment or discharged from inpatient care should at least include: diagnostic assessment, consideration of alternatives, offered support and communication with the patient. In addition to inpatient treatment, there are numerous partial inpatient or outpatient support options for patients with Swic.

Indexed as

Inpatient psychiatric treatmentMedical ethical conflictsPsychiatric emergency medicineSuicidal ideation with instrumental components

Identifiers

PMID42507130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.