ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2026
Arthroscopic versus open excision of dorsal wrist ganglia : A comparative study of clinical and recurrence detected by ultrasound.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDorsal wrist ganglia are the most common benign soft tissue tumors of the wrist, often necessitating surgical intervention due to symptoms or esthetic concerns. Both open and arthroscopic techniques are established treatment options but comparative data on recurrence and functional outcomes remain limited.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study evaluated patients who underwent dorsal wrist ganglion excision between 2017 and 2022. Standardized clinical and ultrasound follow-up was available for 19 patients and formed the basis of the outcome analysis. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire, and Mayo Wrist Scores. Recurrence was determined clinically and via high-resolution ultrasound imaging.
resultsNo significant differences were observed between groups regarding clinical recurrence rates or functional outcomes; however, ultrasound-detected recurrence was significantly more frequent in the open surgery group (89% vs. 30%, p = 0.0198), with patients in this group having 15.4-fold higher odds of subclinical recurrence. Functional scores DASH, PRWE, Mayo Wrist) were comparable between groups, indicating similar recovery in terms of pain and upper limb function.
conclusionArthroscopic and open excision yielded comparable clinical outcomes in this cohort. Ultrasound detected a higher frequency of recurrence, particularly after open excision. The clinical relevance of these findings requires confirmation in larger prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42507106What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.