Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42507068›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2026

Midwives' Views and Practices on Non-pharmacological Methods Used to Relieve Labor Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study from Türkiye.

Sinem Kurt, Aytül Hadımlı

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sinem KurtUrla State Hospital, İzmir, Türkiye. sinemcalliege@gmail.com.
Aytül HadımlıFaculty of Health Sciences, Ege University, Anadolu Caddesi No. 346 İmbatlı Mah., Karşıyaka, 35575, İzmir, Türkiye. aytul.pelik@ege.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4096-7964

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLabor is generally considered as an indescribably painful condition. Non-pharmacological methods applied by midwives during labor are very effective in relieving labor pain. This study was conducted to determine what the opinions of midwives working in the delivery room about non-pharmacological methods used to relieve labor pain are and how they perform such methods.

methodsThis descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted in public hospitals in Izmir, a province in western Türkiye. The study sample comprised 151 midwives who volunteered to participate in the study and met the inclusion criteria.

resultsThe participating midwives' mean length of service in the profession was 19.07 years. Of them, 80.1% stated that non-pharmacological methods should be used during labor. There was a statistically significant relationship between their working in a mother-friendly hospital and their opinions on the use of pharmacological methods during labor (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant and negative relationship between the midwives' length of service in the profession and the number of non-pharmacological methods they had heard of (r=-0.198, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: The participating midwives were aware of the necessity of applying non-pharmacological pain relief methods in delivery. Their application of non-pharmacological methods was greatly affected by the institutions' approaches to this issue and their not having received training on the subject.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelLabor PainMidwiferyPain ManagementAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLabor, ObstetricPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyLaborMidwifeNon-pharmacological methodPain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.