ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Comparison of the performance of hybrids obtained from reciprocal crosses between Anadolu-T and a commercial parent stocks.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the performance of hybrids obtained from crosses between Anadolu-T parent stocks and a commercial parent stocks. The hybrid combinations evaluated were Anadolu-T × Anadolu-T (AA), Commercial × Commercial (CC), Anadolu-T male × Commercial female (AC), and Commercial male × Anadolu-T female (CA). Throughout the 6-week growth period, including the initial live weight, significant differences were observed among all hybrid lines in terms of weekly live weights and live weight gains (p < 0.001). Except for the first week, the weekly live weight values of CC and AC were similar, with no statistically significant differences between these groups (p > 0.05). The average slaughter weights were 3005.00 g for CC and 2952.81 g for AC, respectively. Statistical analyses indicated that differences in weekly feed intake (WFI) among the hybrids were significant during the first four weeks (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05), while cumulative feed intake (CFI) values differed significantly during the first three weeks (p < 0.01). Cumulative feed conversion ratio (FCR) values at 6 weeks of slaughter age, which form the basis of economic efficiency indices, were examined, statistically significant differences were determined among the hybrids (p < 0.01). The values of the CC and AC genotypes were similar, with cumulative FCRs of 1.61 and 1.63, respectively, whereas the cumulative FCR values obtained from the CA and AA genotypes were calculated as 1.68 and 1.78, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42507041What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.