Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42507036›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2026

Evaluation of Molecular Phylogenetic Trees by an Information-Theoretic Metric.

Takuma Nishimaki, Keiko Sato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Takuma NishimakiDepartment of Information Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, 278- 8510, Chiba, Japan.
Keiko SatoDepartment of Information Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, 278- 8510, Chiba, Japan. keiko@is.noda.tus.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding phylogenetic relationships among species is fundamental to many biological studies. Constructing phylogenetic trees based on molecular data is important not only for considering the evolution and classification of organisms, but also for understanding how genes retain and transmit information, which forms the basis of life science. However, it is currently difficult to determine which phylogenetic analysis method, including evolutionary models, is most appropriate for the target sequences, and which of the resulting phylogenetic trees most appropriately represents the underlying evolutionary relationships. Here, we propose a method for inferring common ancestral sequences and introduce an information-theoretic metric to provide a unified framework for quantitatively comparing phylogenetic trees based on information transmission between molecular sequences. Our metric can evaluate which phylogenetic tree is optimal from an information-theoretic point of view by determining and comparing the amount of information in phylogenetic trees generated by different methods in terms of the transmission of information between molecular sequences along the evolutionary process. The metric we introduced will facilitate understanding not only the evolution and classification of organisms, but also the phenomena of life that are deeply related to information transmission.

Indexed as

Information TheoryPhylogenyAlgorithmsEvolution, MolecularModels, GeneticAncestral sequencesInformation theoryMolecular evolutionPhylogenetic tree

Identifiers

PMID42507036
PMCPMC13433539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.