ArticleJournal of vision2026
Preserved contextual modulation of eye movements in psychosis prone individuals.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The framework of predictive processing conceives perception as the integration of prior predictions and sensory data. An important source of priors is contextual information, including semantic context (i.e., the meaningful relationships between objects) and temporal context (i.e., the information provided by recent perceptual experiences). Alterations in the integration of priors and sensory data have been proposed to underlie psychotic experiences. Here, we examined the effects of semantic and temporal contextual information on eye movements in healthy individuals with low and high psychosis-proneness. Healthy participants were assigned to a low or a high psychosis-proneness group based on a questionnaire measuring delusional ideation. Effects of semantic and temporal context on eye movements were assessed using a naturalistic semantic task and a temporal task, respectively. Mixed models were used to investigate group-by-context condition interactions. Replicating previous findings, both tasks yielded robust effects of contextual information on eye movements. Crucially, however, no differences in the context effects in either task were detected between individuals with low and high psychosis proneness. Psychosis proneness in healthy individuals does not alter the impact of context information on eye-movement behavior. These findings are in contrast with previous reports of altered eye-movement behavior in clinical and subclinical psychosis, highlighting the need to delineate the experimental conditions and sample characteristics in which contextual modulation of eye movements is impaired.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.