ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2026
Applicability of Nanopore-only whole-genome sequencing for
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: In recent years, Nanopore sequencing has found its way to clinical laboratories because of its affordability, scalability, and, most importantly, its ability to obtain sequencing results in near-real time. However, despite improved raw read accuracies with the latest generation R10.4.1 flow cells, the question remains whether the achieved accuracy is sufficient for accurate bacterial outbreak investigation, particularly in high-risk settings such as intensive care units (ICUs). In this study, we show that Nanopore-only whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is able to match Illumina-only WGS in terms of accuracy for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.