Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42506889›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2026

Sexuality behind clinic doors: experiences of healthcare professionals in primary care addressing sexuality with older people.

Andrea Kocurkova, Danielle De Boos, Heather Cogger-Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea KocurkovaSchool of Psychology, Sport Science & Wellbeing, College of Health and Science, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Danielle De BoosUniversity of Nottingham Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Doctorate in Clinical Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, B Floor, YANG Fujia Building, Jubilee Campus, Wollaton Road, Nottingham NG8 1BB, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Heather Cogger-WardDoctorate in Clinical Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, B Floor, YANG Fujia Building, Jubilee Campus, Wollaton Road, Nottingham NG8 1BB, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Funding

NHS England
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSexual health in later life remains an overlooked area in healthcare. Despite being the first point of contact for most patients, primary care healthcare professionals (HCPs) rarely initiate discussions about sexuality with older adults (OAs). This study investigates how these HCPs talk about sexuality in later life and examines the extent to which existing guidelines support inclusive, age-appropriate care.

objectiveTo explore NHS primary care professionals' experiences of discussing sexuality with OAs, including the circumstances that prompt these conversations, the factors shaping them and the extent to which professionals use formal guidance in these discussions.

designA qualitative design was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 HCPs in England. An inductive reflexive thematic analysis approach was used for data analysis.

resultsThree key themes were identified. First, unspoken assumptions, clinician discomfort and time pressures often limited discussions, creating uncertainty around how and when to address sexual health. Second, physical symptoms served as 'natural openers,' but such conversations maintained their medical focus, overlooking other aspects contributing to OAs' quality of life. Third, participants described minimal reliance on guidance, instead drawing on instinct or experience. Overall, discussions were reactive and shaped by competing clinical demands. Clinicians consistently expressed a need for clear, concise and psychologically informed tools and training.

conclusionThis study highlights the need to normalise later-life sexual health discussions by attending to clinician discomfort and integrating inclusive practices into routine care. Recognising sexuality as important in later life may help challenge age-related assumptions in primary care.

Indexed as

AgingAttitude of Health PersonnelPrimary Health CareSexual HealthSexualityAgedAge FactorsCommunicationEnglandFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient Relationshealthcare professionalsolder adultsolder peopleprimary carequalitative researchsexuality

Identifiers

PMID42506889
PMCPMC13403180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.