ArticleAge and ageing2026
Sexuality behind clinic doors: experiences of healthcare professionals in primary care addressing sexuality with older people.
Article in Age and ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSexual health in later life remains an overlooked area in healthcare. Despite being the first point of contact for most patients, primary care healthcare professionals (HCPs) rarely initiate discussions about sexuality with older adults (OAs). This study investigates how these HCPs talk about sexuality in later life and examines the extent to which existing guidelines support inclusive, age-appropriate care.
objectiveTo explore NHS primary care professionals' experiences of discussing sexuality with OAs, including the circumstances that prompt these conversations, the factors shaping them and the extent to which professionals use formal guidance in these discussions.
designA qualitative design was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 HCPs in England. An inductive reflexive thematic analysis approach was used for data analysis.
resultsThree key themes were identified. First, unspoken assumptions, clinician discomfort and time pressures often limited discussions, creating uncertainty around how and when to address sexual health. Second, physical symptoms served as 'natural openers,' but such conversations maintained their medical focus, overlooking other aspects contributing to OAs' quality of life. Third, participants described minimal reliance on guidance, instead drawing on instinct or experience. Overall, discussions were reactive and shaped by competing clinical demands. Clinicians consistently expressed a need for clear, concise and psychologically informed tools and training.
conclusionThis study highlights the need to normalise later-life sexual health discussions by attending to clinician discomfort and integrating inclusive practices into routine care. Recognising sexuality as important in later life may help challenge age-related assumptions in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.