Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42506819›Full record

ArticleSports (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Bilateral Deficit Using a Climbing-Specific Fingerboard Test and Its Association with Sport Climbers' Performance.

Fernando Vilela, Amilton Vieira, Rafael Kons, Ubiratan Contreira Padilha, Denis César Leite Vieira, Martim Bottaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fernando VilelaStrength and Conditioning Research Laboratory, College of Physical Education, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0004-9997-2279
Amilton VieiraStrength and Conditioning Research Laboratory, College of Physical Education, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6027-4367
Rafael KonsDepartment of Physical Education, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40170-110, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1615-5464
Ubiratan Contreira PadilhaStrength and Conditioning Research Laboratory, College of Physical Education, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
Denis César Leite VieiraStrength and Conditioning Research Laboratory, College of Physical Education, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0761-1846
Martim BottaroStrength and Conditioning Research Laboratory, College of Physical Education, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the upper-body bilateral deficit (BD) in recreational climbers and to examine its relationship with specific performance. Fifteen recreational climbers (11 men, 4 women; 25-45 years; ≥3 years of experience) performed unilateral and bilateral maximal isometric handgrip strength test (HGT), and unilateral and bilateral maximal isometric strength test using a climbing-specific fingerboard test (CSFT). The fatigue resistance index test (FRI) and the endurance capacity test (ECT) were used as performance tests. Paired Student's T-tests were used to compare bilateral deficit results between CSFT and HGT. Pearson's correlation was used to assess relationships between these variables with the level at 5%. The results showed a significant (

Indexed as

endurance capacityfatigue resistance indexhandgrip strengthmaximal isometric voluntary contractionmuscle strength

Identifiers

PMID42506819
PMCPMC13417058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.