ArticleSports (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Effects of Blood-Flow Restriction During Body-Weight Semi-Squats on Post-Conditioning Drop-Jump Performance in Adolescent Female Volleyball Players.
Article in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated whether body-weight semi-squats (BWSSs) performed under blood-flow restriction (BFR) conditions were associated with higher post-conditioning drop-jump performance compared with the sham condition in adolescent female volleyball players. Thirteen players completed two experimental conditions (BFR and sham) in a randomized, counterbalanced crossover design. A pre-conditioning baseline jump assessment was not included. The BFR condition consisted of three sets of 16 repetitions with 80% of arterial occlusion pressure (AOP), whereas the sham condition was performed at 20% AOP. In each condition, participants performed one drop jump at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 min after the activation protocol. Jump height, impulse, reactive strength index (RSI) and power-related variables were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA. A significant main effect of condition indicated that jump height, RSI, impulse, and power-related variables were greater following the BFR than the sham condition across the post-conditioning assessment period. A significant main effect of time was also observed, with lower performance at 3 min compared to later time points. No condition-by-time interaction was found. These preliminary findings suggest that BWSSs performed under BFR conditions were associated with higher post-conditioning drop-jump performance than the sham condition. Low-load BFR exercise may therefore represent a practical strategy when heavy resistance equipment is unavailable. However, because no pre-conditioning baseline assessment was included, the magnitude of performance enhancement from baseline cannot be determined. Therefore, the findings should be interpreted as differences in post-conditioning performance between BFR and sham conditions rather than definite evidence of baseline to post enhancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.