Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42506793›Full record

ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Portable, Patient-Possessed Health Record: Architecture for Care Coordination as an Alternative to Centralized Data Aggregation.

Richard Henry Parrish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Richard Henry ParrishAlice L. Walton School of Medicine, Bentonville, AR 72712, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5324-9139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fragmentation of clinical information across health systems, community pharmacies, and specialty providers continues to undermine medication safety and emergency care, particularly when patients are unconscious or otherwise unable to communicate their history. The dominant response to this fragmentation has been the construction of a centralized data infrastructure-health information exchanges, prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs), and federated electronic health record (EHR) networks-that aggregates clinical information into institutional databases that are queryable by providers, insurers, regulators, and, in many jurisdictions, law enforcement. This article argues that the same care-coordination problems can be addressed through an architecturally different approach in which the patient, not the institution, holds the integrative artifact. The proposed design, here labeled the Guardian Card (a conceptual architecture, not a commercial product), pairs an HL7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) clinical payload with the SMART Health Cards verifiable-credential framework and a dual-modality (QR code plus near-field communication) physical carrier. After describing the technical architecture, hardware options, and a five-phase deployment roadmap, the design is situated within the surveillance-critical scholarship that has documented PDMP function creep, third-party doctrine erosion, racial disparities in algorithmic prescribing oversight, and the surveillance-instrumentarian repackaging of nominally de-identified prescription data. The Guardian Card is offered as one operational implementation of a patient-controlled medication-record architecture, with community pharmacy and long-term post-acute care, where the Pharmacist eCare Plan integration is most feasible as a recommended first-deployment venue.

Indexed as

FHIRhealth information exchangehealth recordsinteroperabilitymedication reconciliationpharmacyprescription drug monitoring programsprivacySMART Health Cardssurveillance

Identifiers

PMID42506793
PMCPMC13415448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.