ReviewToxins2026
Botulinum Toxin Type A in Spasticity and Cervical Dystonia: Practical Clinical Recommendations from a Mexican Multidisciplinary Panel of Specialist Injectors.
Review in Toxins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cervical dystonia and spasticity are debilitating neuromuscular disorders that substantially impair quality of life. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is a cornerstone therapy; however, heterogeneity in dosing, muscle selection, and guidance techniques can limit outcomes, and Mexico-specific practical guidance is limited. We convened a multidisciplinary panel of Mexican rehabilitation and neurology specialists with extensive experience in BoNT-A injection; recommendations were developed through a three-phase process: a targeted literature search, a structured online survey of Mexican rehabilitation and neurology specialists, and an in-person meeting (21 February 2025) where clinicians reviewed aggregated survey results and refined practical recommendations through structured deliberation. The manuscript provides pragmatic guidance on evaluation and goal setting, muscle selection, working dilutions, dosing ranges, and reinjection intervals, emphasizing ultrasound (US) and/or electromyography (EMG) for deep or high-risk targets. It also summarizes key adverse events and proposes a stepwise approach to inadequate response, prioritizing reassessment of diagnosis, goals, targeting, and techniques before considering immunogenicity testing, product switching, or alternative interventions. These recommendations aim to improve standardization, safety, and goal attainment in routine Mexican practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.