ReviewToxins2026
Botulinum Toxin in Parkinson's Disease Tremor: A Critical Evaluation of the Evidence and Clinical Practice.
Review in Toxins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approximately 30% of patients with tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease (PD) have rest tremor that persists despite optimal dopaminergic therapy. When deep brain stimulation and focused ultrasound are unavailable or declined, the therapeutic options narrow. Botulinum toxin (BoNT) offers a targeted, titratable, reversible approach, but whether a peripheral neuromuscular blocking agent makes sense for a centrally generated tremor is a legitimate question that deserves a direct answer. This narrative critical review appraises what is currently known across PD and non-PD tremor conditions, defines the technical requirements for safe and effective injection, and provides a practical framework for patient selection and clinical management. The PD-specific literature rests on a single positive double-blind randomized controlled trial of 30 patients; all remaining data are open-label or extrapolated from other tremor conditions, and this narrative synthesis combines heterogeneous conditions, outcome scales, and toxin protocols. A recurring technical observation is that, in the available trials, individualized, EMG-guided injection has been associated with substantially lower rates of hand weakness than fixed-dose injection (reported reductions from roughly 30-70% to below 15%) while maintaining tremor reduction, although the degree of benefit and weakness risk vary with the tremor syndrome, injected muscles, baseline impairment, dose, and guidance method. The careful patient selection this approach requires helps the individual clinician and patient achieve tremor relief, but it departs from the unselected real-world PD population and introduces selection bias that makes a large, statistically representative cohort difficult to assemble. In well-selected patients at centers with the appropriate expertise, BoNT may be a clinically useful option, but routine adoption is not yet supported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.