ReviewActa chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca2026
[Blood Loss in Open Spine Surgeries - Preoperative Estimate vs Reality].
Review in Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraoperative blood loss represents a critical challenge in spinal surgery, with the potential to increase morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Significant blood loss is associated with postoperative complications such as respiratory failure, infections, and hematomas. This paper evaluates current methods of estimating blood loss and highlights the discrepancy between intraoperative clinical estimates and the actual total blood loss, with a specific focus on the phenomenon of hidden blood loss (HBL). The concept of Total Blood Loss (TBL) is analyzed as the sum of Visible Blood Loss (VBL), consisting of blood in suction canisters, sponges, and drains, and HBL, which results from hemolysis and sequestration of blood into tissues. Mathematical formulas, specifically the Gross equation and Nadler's formula for patient blood volume, are discussed as tools for calculating TBL based on hematocrit changes. Visual estimation is consistently shown to be inaccurate, often leading to significant underestimation, especially in losses exceeding 1,000 ml. Research indicates that in major spinal procedures, approximately 21% of the total intraoperative blood loss is captured in surgical sponges. For practical intraoperative monitoring, a "28% coefficient" should be added to the volume in the suction canister to provide a realistic estimate of the blood trapped in textiles. Furthermore, HBL accounts for at least 30% of the total perioperative loss. In extensive posterior thoracolumbar fusions, the visible blood in the suction canister may represent about half of the actual TBL only. Younger patients are paradoxically more susceptible to higher HBL due to more dynamic transcapillary refill and greater vascular compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42506690What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.