Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42506686›Full record

SynthesisActa chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca2026

[Adjacent Segment Disease in Lumbar Spine and Lumbosacral Junction Stabilisation: Systematic Review].

Jan Zemánek, Jan Štulík, Zdeněk Klézl

Abstract readSystematic ReviewEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jan ZemánekKlinika spondylochirurgie 1. lekarske fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultni nemocnice Motol a Homolka, Praha.
Jan ŠtulíkKlinika spondylochirurgie 1. lekarske fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultni nemocnice Motol a Homolka, Praha.
Zdeněk KlézlKlinika spondylochirurgie 1. lekarske fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultni nemocnice Motol a Homolka, Praha.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the studyThis paper aims to analyse available scientific sources related to adjacent segment disease after the surgical stabilisation of lumbar spine. To be specific, to the incidence, risk factors, gender and age of patients, correlation between the length of the instrumentation and ASD development, and the effects of suboptimal sagittal spine stability. MATERIAL AND

methodsA systematic review was elaborated in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guideline. A literature search in PubMed database was conducted in January 2025. The papers included in the systematic review were published between 2004 and 2023.

resultsThe search brought about 1,014 results, of which 59 studies were shortlisted based on their title and abstract. Those 59 articles were subsequently thoroughly examined and unsuitable papers were excluded. Yet another study meeting our criteria was identified through the analysis of cited references. A total of 17 papers that satisfied the predetermined criteria were selected. The number of patients included in the cohorts ranged from 117 to 3,799. The subjects were followed up for the period of at least 12 months up to 10 years postoperatively, the mean follow-up period reached 5.44 years. At the time of initial surgery, the age of the followed-up patients was 18 to 74 years, with a mean age of 56.67 years. The ASD incidence ranged from 0.74% to 30.3%. As concerns surgical therapy, 2.62%-27.4% of patients underwent surgery for adjacent segment disease. The most commonly referred to factor contributing to ASD development was the adjacent segment degeneration visible already preoperatively as well as iatrogenic damage to adjacent facets, high BMI, length of the fixation, sagittal balance, rheumatoid arthritis, or age. Osteoporosis, smoking, or diabetes mellitus, on the other hand, were not confirmed as risk factors. DISCUSSION: Currently, there is a large body of studies on ASD published over several decades. This fact further reinforces its high clinical significance and long-term interest of academia in spine surgery.

conclusionsASD is a common postoperative complication in instrumented lumbar and lumbosacral fusions. The most commonly cited risk factors were preoperative adjacent segment degeneration, followed by iatrogenic alterations on unfixed intervertebral joints, sagittal imbalance, and higher BMI of the patient. Some authors also refer to advanced age as a factor contributing to earlier development of adjacent segment degeneration. Different conclusions are stated with respect to the fixation length, with more frequent reference to higher incidence of ASD in longer-segment fixation. The outcomes of other studies, however, reveal that the frequency of ASD development is independent of the number of fixed segments. Moreover, in one case, protective effects of long-segment fixations were proven by the authors. No correlation between gender, smoking, diabetes mellitus or osteoporosis with adjacent segment disease development was confirmed. Although the incidence of ASD can be reduced by correct indication and surgical technique, we shall continue to encounter this condition in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraePostoperative ComplicationsSacrumSpinal DiseasesSpinal FusionHumansLumbosacral RegionRisk Factorsadjacent segment degenerationadjacent segment diseaseASD.clinical outcomeslumbar spinespinal fusionsystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.