ReviewVaccines2026
Six Years of COVID-19: Lessons from Epidemiology, Vaccination Campaigns, Clinical Risk Stratification, and Thromboembolic Surveillance.
Review in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Six years after the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 remains a dynamic public health challenge shaped by viral evolution, heterogeneous population immunity, changing vaccine strategies, and the long-term consequences of acute infection. Although the transition from pandemic emergency to endemic circulation has reduced the global burden of severe disease, COVID-19 continues to affect vulnerable populations, particularly older adults, frail patients, immunocompromised individuals, and subjects with multiple comorbidities. Vaccination has substantially modified the clinical course of infection, reducing hospitalization, intensive care admission, and mortality, while also reshaping surveillance priorities toward variant monitoring, vaccine effectiveness, waning immunity, breakthrough infections, and long COVID. At the same time, the pandemic has highlighted the need for integrated clinical risk stratification, including age, sex, frailty, inflammatory biomarkers, respiratory support requirements, and thromboembolic risk. Venous and arterial thrombotic complications have represented a key feature of severe COVID-19 and remain relevant for both acute management and post-discharge follow-up. This narrative review summarizes the main lessons learned from six years of COVID-19, focusing on epidemiology, vaccination campaigns, clinical risk assessment, thromboembolic complications, and surveillance strategies. Particular attention is given to the need for multidisciplinary and data-driven approaches capable of integrating virological, epidemiological, clinical, geriatric, and vascular medicine perspectives. Future COVID-19 surveillance should move beyond case counting and incorporate vaccine impact, population vulnerability, thrombotic and bleeding complications, long-term outcomes, and preparedness for emerging variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.