ReviewVaccines2026
A Double-Edged Sword: Breast Milk-Derived Maternal Antibodies and Infant Vaccine Responses: A Narrative Review.
Review in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal defense against pathogens relies on maternal antibodies transferred both through the placenta (IgG) and through breast milk (primarily secretory IgA). Maternal IgG antibodies are transferred across the placenta to the fetus mainly via the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which is expressed at high levels in placental syncytiotrophoblasts, and results in the acquisition of maternal-fetal IgG. Transplacental transfer via the FcRn pathway can provide therapeutic proteins and protective antibodies following maternal vaccination. However, maternal IgG antibodies can bind to vaccine antigens such as measles, tetanus, and poliovirus, resulting in rapid clearance through FcgRIIB-mediated inhibition and inadequate B cell activation. In this way, they can inhibit de novo immune responses and significantly reduce vaccine response. On the other hand, the interference that breast milk-derived antibodies may have on vaccine-induced immunity is still largely unknown. Vaccination against influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19 during pregnancy or lactation has been shown to induce the production of protective, pathogen-specific, secretory IgA and IgG antibodies in breast milk. Conversely, studies found that breast milk-derived antibodies of vaccinated mothers reduced vaccine-induced immunity in breastfed infants by accelerating the clearance of vaccine antigen, resulting in reduced antigen availability and reduced plasma cell formation after vaccination. Additional factors in middle- and low-income countries, including environmental (increased microbiome diversity, environmental intestinal dysfunction, malnutrition, co-infections) and breastfeeding practices, may exacerbate the interference effect of maternal antibodies. Current evidence supports that breastfeeding is associated with a reduced immunological response exclusively to the rotavirus vaccine. However, the limited evidence base to date precludes definitive conclusions regarding the role of breast milk-derived antibodies in modulating vaccine-induced immunity. Nevertheless, the evidence suggests that although maternal antibodies may theoretically reduce vaccine immunogenicity, the overall protective benefits of breastfeeding outweigh any potential interference with vaccine responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.