ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2026
Static and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printable Aligner Resins: An In Vitro Study with FTIR Chemical Characterization.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDirectly printed aligners are advancing rapidly, but the mechanical behavior of the resins behind them is still only partly understood. This in vitro study compared the static flexural behavior, short-term stress relaxation, and FTIR profiles of five Class IIa-certified 3D-printable resins for direct orthodontic aligners.
methodsThe five resins, TC-85, TA-28, DCA, Clear-A V2, and Ortho Flex, were printed as standardized rectangular bars and tested at 37 °C. Three-point bending to 1 mm deflection yielded the maximum flexural stress and the flexural modulus, while a 30 min hold at fixed deflection captured stress relaxation. FTIR added a qualitative chemical characterization.
resultsDifferences between resins were substantial. DCA led on every static measure, pairing the highest flexural stress and modulus with the highest final relaxation modulus and the best stiffness retention. Clear-A V2 was also statically stiff but retained force only intermediately, whereas TC-85 combined high stiffness with pronounced relaxation. Ortho Flex performed modestly under static loading yet held on to a moderate fraction of its stiffness, and TA-28 relaxed the most.
conclusionsDirectly printed aligner resins are mechanically heterogeneous, and static bending alone did not predict short-term force stability. Relaxation metrics should therefore accompany static testing whenever a resin is selected for a specific clinical purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.