Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42506555›Full record

ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2026

Functional Adhesives for a Restorative Future.

Andreas Katsonis, Monica Silvia Tatarciuc, Anca Mihaela Vitalariu, Roxana Ionela Vasluianu, Jamal Al-Ashkar, Catalina Holban Cioloca, Andrea-Simoni Katsoni, Panagiotis Perperidis, Irina Gradinaru, Adina Oana Armencia and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andreas KatsonisGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0009-0003-7568-6019
Monica Silvia TatarciucGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7178-8283
Anca Mihaela VitalariuGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-8341-8810
Roxana Ionela VasluianuGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0867-1135
Jamal Al-AshkarGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Catalina Holban CiolocaGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Andrea-Simoni KatsoniOral Diagnosis and Radiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Panagiotis PerperidisPrivate Clinic, 16674 Athens, Greece.
Irina GradinaruGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Adina Oana ArmenciaGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0921-4382
Ovidiu StamatinGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1518-6090

Funding

This research received no external funding. This research received no external funding.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cementation of indirect restorations has undergone a profound change over the past century, evolving from a philosophy of purely mechanical cementation to sophisticated biomaterials science based on adhesion. The aim of this narrative review is to provide essential context for understanding contemporary clinical decision-making. A key aspect is the structural and compositional characteristics of enamel and dentin as bonding substrates, underlining why enamel remains the gold standard, while dentin continues to present significant challenges. The synthesis is based on evidence of adhesive strategies for the four main classes of contemporary restorative materials, such as glass-ceramics (lithium disilicate and leucite), polycrystalline zirconia, resin-matrix ceramics (hybrid ceramics), and indirect composites. Each material was detailed in terms of surface penetration (e.g., hydrofluoric acid etching and air abrasion), chemical coupling (e.g., silanization and MDP-based primers), and appropriate resin cement selection (light-cured, dual-cured, or self-adhesive). A step-by-step clinical protocol is synthesized based on current evidence, integrating critical techniques such as immediate dentin sealing and optimized polymerization. This review concludes that while adhesive resin cements provide predictable long-term results, significant challenges remain, guiding future clinical research and innovation.

Indexed as

adhesive cementationdentin bondingenamel etchinghybrid ceramicslithium disilicateresin cementsuniversal adhesiveszirconia

Identifiers

PMID42506555
PMCPMC13412557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.