Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42506546›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2026

Comparative Hydrodynamic Analysis and Optimization of Gyroid and Diamond Scaffolds with Functionally Graded Porosity.

Boming Gong, Jia'ao Zhu, Yun Guo, Yameng Xiao, Hongwen Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Boming GongSchool of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China.
Jia'ao ZhuSchool of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China.
Yun GuoSchool of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6088-6849
Yameng XiaoSchool of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China.
Hongwen XuSchool of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China.ORCID 0009-0003-8505-5472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a numerical investigation into the hydrodynamic and biomechanical performance of bone-repair scaffolds based on Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMSs). Focusing on Gyroid and Diamond architectures, scaffolds with uniform (40-70%) and functionally graded porosities were developed. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations were employed to evaluate permeability, pressure drop, and Wall Shear Stress (WSS) distributions. Results indicate distinct topological advantages: the Gyroid structure demonstrates superior permeability and uniform WSS distribution due to its isotropic fluid channels, whereas the Diamond structure maintains better flow velocity stability. Crucially, the introduction of a porosity gradient (40-60%) successfully mitigates localized pressure surges and optimizes the bioactive WSS window for cell differentiation. Notably, increasing porosity to 70% in Gyroid scaffolds yielded a 277% enhancement in permeability. These findings establish a theoretical basis for designing functionally graded TPMS scaffolds that balance fluid transport efficiency with a favorable cellular microenvironment.

Indexed as

bone tissue engineeringcomputational fluid dynamicsGyroidporosity gradientTPMS structure

Identifiers

PMID42506546
PMCPMC13412265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.