ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2026
Influence of Post-Processing Techniques on Surface Roughness, Wettability, and Friction of SLM-Manufactured CoCrW Orthodontic Materials.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of post-processing on the surface roughness, wettability, and frictional behavior of selective laser-melted (SLM) cobalt-chromium-tungsten (CoCrW) alloys for orthodontic use. The SLM-CoCrW specimens were tested in as-manufactured, mechanically polished, and electropolished states. Surface characterization via stylus profilometry and atomic force microscopy (AFM) showed that both polishing methods reduced macro- and micro-scale roughness, with electropolishing producing the smoothest, most uniform topography. Static water contact angle (WCA) measurements revealed that mechanical polishing provided an optimal balance of roughness and hydrophilicity, resulting in the lowest friction, while ultrasmooth electropolished surfaces exhibited slightly higher friction due to increased hydrophobicity and a uniform Cr-rich oxide layer confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). XPS also indicated that electropolishing generated a homogenous chromium oxide passive film, whereas mechanical polishing left a chemically heterogeneous surface with exposed metallic sites. Importantly, performance is not governed solely by surface roughness; surface chemistry is equally critical, and both must be considered together-along with wettability and tribological behavior-to achieve optimal functional outcomes. From a clinical perspective, optimization of surface roughness and surface chemistry may result in decreased frictional resistance, improved sliding mechanics, and enhanced long-term performance of additively manufactured orthodontic components; however, the present study was restricted to in vitro characterization under simplified laboratory conditions, and further investigations involving artificial saliva, long-term aging, wear and clinical simulations are necessary to validate the translational relevance of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.