ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2026
A Multimodal Assessment of a New Self-Adhering Flowable Composite: Dental Pulp Stem Cell Viability and Bond Strength.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Self-adhering flowable composites (SAFCs) were developed to simplify restorative procedures by eliminating separate adhesive steps; however, their bonding performance, mechanical properties, and biological properties remain controversial. This study evaluated a newly developed SAFC (SA-100R) compared with three commercial SAFCs (Fusio Liquid Dentin, Constic, and Vertise Flow) and a conventional composite (Clearfil AP-X used with a two-step self-etch adhesive). Microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin, failure modes, Knoop microhardness, resin-dentin interfacial morphology (SEM), elemental composition (EDX), and cytocompatibility (CCK-8, LIVE/DEAD staining) were assessed. The conventional composite system exhibited significantly higher µTBS than all SAFCs (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.