Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42506366›Full record

Observational studyMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Post-Anesthesia Care Unit Duration After Total Hip Arthroplasty Under Spinal Anesthesia in Routine Hospital Practice: A Comparison with Contemporary Arthroplasty Literature.

Christina Soerensen, Christina Froeslev-Friis, Lisbeth Quitzau, Gunhild Kjaergaard-Andersen, Artur Jawor, Rajesh Prabhakar Bhavsar

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christina SoerensenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, South Jutland Hospital, 6200 Aabenraa, Denmark.
Christina Froeslev-FriisDepartment of Regional Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Aabenraa, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0007-2054-3386
Lisbeth QuitzauDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, South Jutland Hospital, 6200 Aabenraa, Denmark.
Gunhild Kjaergaard-AndersenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, South Jutland Hospital, 6200 Aabenraa, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1465-311X
Artur JaworDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, South Jutland Hospital, 6200 Aabenraa, Denmark.
Rajesh Prabhakar BhavsarDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, South Jutland Hospital, 6200 Aabenraa, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-anesthesia care unit (PACU) duration after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is relevant for ward transfer, early mobilization, and perioperative flow, but is inconsistently reported as a distinct recovery outcome. This study evaluated PACU duration after primary THA under spinal anesthesia in routine hospital-based practice and interpreted the observed duration in relation to contemporary arthroplasty literature.

methodsThis retrospective observational cohort study included adult patients undergoing primary THA under spinal anesthesia within two units of a regional hospital. PACU duration was defined as time from PACU arrival until discharge to the orthopedic ward. Demographic, anesthetic, perioperative, and recovery variables were extracted from electronic medical records. Univariate analyses and multivariable linear regression were used to explore factors associated with PACU duration. A focused contextual literature comparison was performed to interpret the observed duration in relation to reported early recovery endpoints, with direct comparison anchored to conventional PACU or recovery-room intervals before ward transfer or immediate pathway progression.

resultsNinety-seven of 150 screened patients were included. Mean PACU duration was 162.3 ± 58.5 min. PACU duration was numerically longer in Unit A than Unit S, but the difference was not statistically significant. Reported early recovery endpoints in the literature were heterogeneous. In univariate analysis, male sex and exploratory spinal local anesthetic dose > 13 mg were associated with longer PACU duration. In multivariable analysis, male sex remained associated with longer PACU duration, whereas spinal dose was not independently associated when analyzed as a continuous variable.

conclusionsPACU duration after THA under spinal anesthesia should be interpreted as a multifactorial, workflow-sensitive outcome rather than a purely anesthetic recovery measure. Differences in discharge criteria, recovery pathways, and endpoint definitions limit direct comparison across studies. PACU duration may be most meaningful as an operational recovery and flow indicator within broadly comparable clinical settings.

Indexed as

Anesthesia Recovery PeriodAnesthesia, SpinalArthroplasty, Replacement, HipAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecovery RoomRetrospective StudiesTime Factorscontextual literature reviewPACU durationperioperative workflowpost-anesthesia care unitrecovery durationspinal anesthesiatotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID42506366
PMCPMC13413505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.