SynthesisMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Assessment of Sexual Function Following Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHysterectomy is one of the most frequently performed major gynecological procedures, yet its effect on sexual quality of life remains unclear.
objectiveTo evaluate changes in sexual quality of life following hysterectomy and to determine whether cervical preservation is associated with improved postoperative sexual function.
methodsFive databases were systematically searched from inception to February 2026. Eligible studies reported pre- and postoperative sexual quality-of-life outcomes after hysterectomy using validated or non-validated questionnaires. All surgical indications, approaches, and study designs were included. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I. Mean score differences were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression within a frequentist framework. Heterogeneity was assessed with τ
resultsThirty-four studies were included in the systematic review, among them sixteen studies comprising 2341 patients were included in the statistical synthesis comprising three randomized controlled trials and thirteen observational studies. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) was the most commonly reported outcome. Across all hysterectomy types, including total, abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal approaches, no clinically or statistically significant improvement in postoperative sexual function was observed compared with baseline. Subtotal hysterectomy did not demonstrate a meaningful advantage over total hysterectomy. FSFI total scores were consistent with sexual dysfunction at baseline and remained below the established cutoff (≤26.55) during follow-up across all surgical routes. No hysterectomy approach was associated with a clinically relevant change in sexual quality of life.
conclusionsPostoperative changes in sexual function after hysterectomy were small and non-significant overall. Cervical preservation did not provide measurable benefit. Surgical approach selection should therefore not be based on expectations of improved sexual outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.