ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Role of Thromboelastometry in Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy: A Narrative Review.
Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) represents an early, predominantly prothrombotic disturbance that is difficult to detect using conventional coagulation tests. This review aims to evaluate whether rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) provides added value in the diagnosis and phenotyping of SIC compared with standard laboratory parameters. We summarize current evidence on SIC pathophysiology and its relationship to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), with particular focus on mechanisms driving hypercoagulability and fibrinolytic shutdown. The limitations of routine tests, platelet count, PT/INR, fibrinogen, and fibrin-related markers are examined, especially their inability to capture early dynamic changes in coagulation. We then outline the principles of ROTEM and review clinical studies assessing its application in sepsis. Available data consistently demonstrate increased clot firmness, frequently driven by elevated fibrinogen, along with impaired fibrinolysis. These patterns often precede overt SIC or DIC and are associated with worse clinical outcomes, including organ dysfunction and mortality. Finally, we discuss the implications of these findings for clinical management. While routine anticoagulation in unselected septic patients remains unsupported, integrating SIC criteria with ROTEM profiles may improve risk stratification and help identify prothrombotic phenotypes that could benefit from targeted therapies. Overall, ROTEM appears to be a valuable adjunct to conventional testing, with potential to refine diagnostic accuracy and guide future interventional strategies in septic coagulopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.