ReviewJournal of imaging2026
Structuring Variability in Human Gait Datasets: A Covariate-Centered Taxonomy and Systematic Review of Image- and Depth-Based Collections.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human gait datasets play a central role in the development and evaluation of computer vision models. However, the current dataset landscape remains highly heterogeneous, with inconsistent reporting of acquisition conditions, user variability, and sensing configurations, which limits reproducibility and hinders principled cross-dataset comparability. In this work, we propose a covariate-centered, modality-agnostic taxonomy for gait datasets, explicitly structuring variability across scene-level, user-level, and sensor-level factors. The proposed framework enables consistent characterization of datasets through a standardized set of covariates (A-R), bridging differences across application domains and sensing modalities. Following a systematic review protocol aligned with PRISMA 2020, we analyze 47 publicly available image- and depth-based human gait datasets spanning healthcare, biometric, and attribute-recognition application domains. Using the proposed taxonomy, we derive a quantitative analysis of covariate coverage, revealing systematic biases in current dataset design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.