ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Decadal Changes in Institutional Diagnostic Reference Levels for X-Ray Angiography: A Retrospective Comparative Study.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Angiography is a key imaging modality for the diagnosis and treatment of vascular diseases, and the growing sophistication of interventional procedures has heightened the need for radiation dose optimization. Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) are widely used to monitor patient exposure and to support optimization in accordance with the ALARA principle. This study compared radiation dose metrics from a newly installed angiographic system at Attikon University Hospital with those obtained from the institution's previous system and with values reported in the published literature. Radiation dose and procedural parameters were retrospectively collected for digital cerebral subtraction angiography (DSA), embolization, nephrostomy, vertebroplasty, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), chemoembolization, and injection procedures. Dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy-related DAP, patient entrance dose indicators, and fluoroscopy time were analyzed. Median DAP values ranged from 5.72 to 349.60 Gy·cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.