ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Preprocessing for Robust Spinal Cord Segmentation in Cervical Myelopathy.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate spinal cord segmentation is important for quantitative analysis of spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging, including measurement of cross-sectional area and diffusion-based microstructural characterization. In pathological conditions like cervical myelopathy, the shape deformation induced by cord compression is extreme, rendering automated segmentation particularly challenging. While deep learning-based methods yield good results in healthy or mildly pathological cases, their reliability suffers when anatomical assumptions fail under compression. In this work, we introduce a pathology-aware, boundary-focused preprocessing framework that directly aims to mitigate failure modes imposed by cord compression. Instead of generic preprocessing, each component aims to enhance intensity homogeneity, suppress noise and improve boundary visibility. At the core of this approach is a multi-representation input derived from a single T2*-weighted scan, whereby complementary intensity-, contrast- and edge-enhanced representations are fed to the U-Net model. The proposed framework is evaluated on spinal cord MRI data from three clinical centers (194 cervical myelopathy cases). The results demonstrate that the proposed preprocessing framework improves segmentation accuracy, robustness, and stability, particularly in anatomically challenging regions affected by compression. These findings highlight the importance of pathology-aware preprocessing for reliable spinal cord segmentation in cervical myelopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.