ArticleJournal of imaging2026
BDKD-Net: Boundary-Probability Knowledge Distillation for Compact Polyp Segmentation.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Selective Confidence-Guided Projection-Based Encoding for Medical Image Classification.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate polyp segmentation in colonoscopy supports early detection of colorectal cancer, but compact models under a student-only inference budget tend to lose boundary fidelity. BDKD-Net is a 3.72M-parameter compact student trained under a composite knowledge-distillation loss that combines a response signal, a boundary-probability signal restricted to a static teacher-derived boundary band, and an auxiliary detail-feature alignment; the teacher is used only during training and discarded at inference. In a uniform five-seed re-run on a locked Kvasir-SEG and CVC-ClinicDB development split, the same-architecture scratch student reaches Dev Dice 0.9210 ± 0.0029 and boundary F1 at 3-pixel tolerance 0.7726 ± 0.0057, while full BDKD-Net reaches 0.9300 ± 0.0029 and 0.8008 ± 0.0094. Boundary-probability distillation is the load-bearing signal: it has the highest mean Dev BF1t3 among the single KD signals and carries the boundary gain at no inference cost, with the full model reaching four-external Dice 0.8225 ± 0.0071 at 1.76 GFLOPs and 140.9 FPS. Among the directly reproduced baselines, the higher-Dice Polyp-PVT (0.8417 ± 0.0091) needs 6.8× the parameters and 5.7× the compute at roughly half the frame rate. BDKD-Net thus delivers a compact, boundary-faithful student that keeps most of the accuracy of much larger models at a fraction of their inference cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.