ArticleJournal of imaging2026
A Vignetting Correction Method for Remote Sensing Images Based on Low-Rank Modeling and Polynomial Fitting.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vignetting introduces spatial radiometric nonuniformity into remote sensing images and degrades subsequent radiometric analysis, image interpretation, and calibration-related applications. To address this problem, this paper proposes a vignetting correction method based on low-rank modeling and polynomial fitting. The method constructs a multi-frame data matrix in the logarithmic domain, extracts the shared vignette component through rank-1 low-rank modeling, and further recovers a smooth vignette field through polynomial fitting. Experiments were conducted using real remote sensing images, simulated vignetted images, and star images. Among the three ablation variants, the proposed full method achieved the best performance, with MAE, MAD, Center-MAE, and Edge-MAE values of 0.48%, 3.65%, 0.14%, and 0.52%, respectively. Compared with the low-rank-only method, these metrics were reduced by 23.8%, 32.8%, 71.4%, and 20.0%, respectively. An additional all-frame comparison across 28 dataset settings showed that the proposed rank-1 model achieved mean accuracy comparable to nuclear-norm-based standard RPCA, while exhibiting lower cross-dataset variability in MAE, MAD, and Edge-MAE. For star images, the method reduced image-plane nonuniformity from 1.39-1.92% to 0.59-0.80% while preserving background-subtracted stellar DN values. These results demonstrate that the proposed method provides physically interpretable and stable vignetting correction while maintaining radiometric consistency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.