ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Inter-Observer Reproducibility of [18F]FDG PET/CT Radiomic Features in Primary Breast Carcinoma.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiomic feature stability is a necessary condition for clinical translation, yet the impact of inter-observer segmentation variability remains insufficiently characterized for [18F]FDG PET/CT in breast carcinoma. We evaluated the inter-observer reproducibility of 107 original radiomic features extracted from [18F]FDG PET/CT images of 42 patients with biopsy-proven, treatment-naive primary breast carcinoma, using an IBSI-aligned PyRadiomics workflow. Two nuclear medicine physicians independently segmented each tumor using semi-automatic Otsu thresholding to generate an initial tumor mask, followed by manual correction. Reproducibility was quantified using ICC(A,1) with bootstrap-derived 95% confidence intervals. A two-stage reproducibility and redundancy-based feature reduction strategy, combining an ICC threshold with Spearman correlation-based redundancy removal, was applied across nine threshold combinations, and features were classified into three pre-specified stability categories. The segmentation agreement was good, with a mean Dice coefficient of 0.847. Most features showed excellent reproducibility (81/107, 75.7% with ICC ≥ 0.90; median ICC 0.972), whereas shape features based on maximum lesion extension showed poor reproducibility (ICC 0.10-0.25). The reduction strategy resulted in 19 stable non-redundant features, with eight retained across all threshold combinations; 79 features (73.8%) met high-stability criteria. These results and the proposed stability classification framework provide a methodological basis for future predictive PET radiomics studies in breast carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.