ReviewJournal of imaging2026
Microscopy Cell Segmentation: Review and Benchmarking of Task-Specific and Foundation Models.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell segmentation plays a key role in a wide range of biomedical imaging applications, from single-cell analysis to pathology assessment. While classical deep learning architectures such as U-Net, StarDist, and HoVer-Net have set strong baselines, their reliance on domain-specific training limits generalization across diverse microscopy modalities. The emergence of foundation models, particularly the Segment Anything Model (SAM) and its derivatives, has introduced a paradigm shift toward more universal and adaptable segmentation frameworks. In this review, we summarize key advances in microscopy cell segmentation, highlighting both traditional methods and recent foundation model-based approaches. Beyond surveying the literature, we present an experimental comparison of four representative models-our proposed YOLO-SAM, along with CellSAM, Cellpose-SAM, and StarDist-tested on both fluorescence and brightfield microscopy spanning diverse cell populations and shapes. Our findings illustrate trade-offs between accuracy, robustness, and adaptability, with foundation-based models showing particular promise for cross-domain performance. By combining a comprehensive review with systematic benchmarking, this work provides practical guidance for researchers and outlines current challenges and future opportunities in developing robust, generalizable cell segmentation methods for microscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.