Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42506143›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2026

Microscopy Cell Segmentation: Review and Benchmarking of Task-Specific and Foundation Models.

Diego Martí-Pérez, Valery Naranjo, Adrián Colomer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diego Martí-PérezInstituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano (Human-Tech), Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV), Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0009-0002-2316-0122
Valery NaranjoInstituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano (Human-Tech), Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV), Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Adrián ColomerInstituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano (Human-Tech), Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV), Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain.

Funding

European Commission through the projects DISRUPT 101099663European Commission through the projects NEXTSCREEN 101119729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell segmentation plays a key role in a wide range of biomedical imaging applications, from single-cell analysis to pathology assessment. While classical deep learning architectures such as U-Net, StarDist, and HoVer-Net have set strong baselines, their reliance on domain-specific training limits generalization across diverse microscopy modalities. The emergence of foundation models, particularly the Segment Anything Model (SAM) and its derivatives, has introduced a paradigm shift toward more universal and adaptable segmentation frameworks. In this review, we summarize key advances in microscopy cell segmentation, highlighting both traditional methods and recent foundation model-based approaches. Beyond surveying the literature, we present an experimental comparison of four representative models-our proposed YOLO-SAM, along with CellSAM, Cellpose-SAM, and StarDist-tested on both fluorescence and brightfield microscopy spanning diverse cell populations and shapes. Our findings illustrate trade-offs between accuracy, robustness, and adaptability, with foundation-based models showing particular promise for cross-domain performance. By combining a comprehensive review with systematic benchmarking, this work provides practical guidance for researchers and outlines current challenges and future opportunities in developing robust, generalizable cell segmentation methods for microscopy.

Indexed as

cell segmentationdeep learningfoundation modelsinstance segmentationmachine learningmicroscopy

Identifiers

PMID42506143
PMCPMC13412841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.