ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Collaborative Optimization of High-Resolution Representation and Miss-Sensitive Supervision for Aero-Engine Micro-Crack Detection.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aero-engine blades operate under extreme conditions involving high temperature, pressure, rotational speed, and cyclic loads, making them susceptible to surface defects such as micro-cracks. Due to their small scale, weak edges, low contrast, and elongated morphology, micro-cracks are easily affected by metallic reflections, uneven illumination, and complex background textures in borescope images, resulting in high missed-detection rates for conventional detection methods. To address these challenges, this study proposes an improved YOLO11-based framework for aero-engine blade micro-crack detection. The proposed method introduces P1/P2 shallow high-resolution detection branches to enhance the perception of fine crack edges and textures, incorporates Focal Loss to alleviate foreground-background imbalance, applies object-level Tversky Loss to strengthen false-negative constraints, and adopts a hard mining strategy to improve learning for difficult crack samples. Experiments conducted on a real aero-engine borescope image dataset demonstrate that the proposed model achieves a Precision of 0.9981, Recall of 0.9606, F1-score of 0.9790, mAP50 of 0.9781, and mAP50-95 of 0.6938 on an independent test set. Compared with the YOLO11 baseline, the proposed method significantly improves crack detection accuracy, localization quality, and robustness in complex borescope inspection scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.