Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42506124›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

MBRSNet: Boundary-Aware Multi-Task Learning with Signed Distance Field Regression for Polyp Segmentation.

Ruishi Lin, Liyong Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruishi LinSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai 264209, China.ORCID 0009-0003-3491-090X
Liyong MaSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai 264209, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0718-379X

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2024YFC2417403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate polyp segmentation in colonoscopic images remains challenging due to low contrast, irregular morphology, and significant distribution shifts across datasets, which often lead to unreliable boundary delineation and poor generalization. Existing methods typically treat boundary information as an auxiliary cue or incorporate boundary information through hand-crafted architectural designs, resulting in limited integration between boundary-sensitive features and region-aware representations. In this paper, we propose a boundary-aware multi-task learning framework, termed MBRSNet, which explicitly models and exploits the complementarity between the segmentation task and the auxiliary signed distance field (SDF) regression task. Specifically, we formulate boundary modeling as an auxiliary SDF regression task, providing dense and continuous structural supervision without requiring additional annotations. To effectively couple the two tasks, we design a cross-gated multi-task bottleneck that enables bidirectional and selective feature interaction, allowing each task to selectively leverage complementary information while suppressing task-irrelevant responses. Furthermore, a hierarchical cross-task guidance strategy is introduced in the decoding stage, where boundary-aware weighting and segmentation-guided alignment jointly refine multi-scale features, ensuring consistent integration of boundary cues and regional semantics. Extensive experiments on five benchmark datasets demonstrate that MBRSNet achieves competitive or superior performance compared with representative state-of-the-art methods in both segmentation accuracy and cross-dataset generalization. In particular, the proposed framework achieves superior boundary delineation under challenging conditions and exhibits strong robustness to domain shifts, highlighting the effectiveness of structured task interaction for boundary-aware medical image segmentation.

Indexed as

boundary modelingmulti-task learningpolyp segmentation

Identifiers

PMID42506124
PMCPMC13413344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.