Benchmarking Barren Plateau Mitigation Strategies in Quantum Neural Networks on Standard and Medical Image Datasets.

Barren plateaus (BPs) pose a major trainability challenge for quantum neural networks (QNNs) by causing gradients to concentrate near zero as circuit size, depth, or expressibility increases. This study presents a comparative benchmark of 10 BP mitigation strategies across six qubit settings (2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20) and three datasets of increasing complexity: Iris, MNIST, and MedMNIST. The evaluated methods include eight initialization-based strategies (Beta, Gaussian, Uniform Norm, CNN-based initialization, He-normal, He-uniform, Xavier-normal, and Xavier-uniform), one model-based variational encoder, and one optimization-based time-nonlocal Fourier parameterization. Experiments were implemented using PennyLane 3.10 and PyTorch 2.5 with simulator backends. We evaluate trainability using gradient variance and training loss, and we clarify that the benchmark analyzes simulated QNN optimization behavior rather than hardware-noise-resilient or noisy-label learning. Across the tested two-layer circuit configurations, the mitigation strategies maintained measurable gradient variance and stable loss reduction, suggesting that severe barren plateau behavior was not observed under the benchmark conditions. CNN-based and Beta initialization showed strong empirical behavior in variance retention and convergence speed, while Gaussian initialization was comparatively weaker in higher-dimensional settings. The study provides a reproducible benchmark structure for comparing BP mitigation behavior and identifies important limitations related to circuit depth, hardware noise, feature encoding, and classification performance that should be addressed in future QNN benchmarking.