Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42506102›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2026

Beyond Description: A Functional GIUS-Based Algorithm for Enteral Feeding Decisions in the ICU.

Nick Weidner, Christian von Loeffelholz, Robert Patejdl, Jan Seyfferth, Heinrich Volker Groesdonk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nick WeidnerDepartment of Intensive Care, Helios Clinic Erfurt, 99089 Erfurt, Germany.
Christian von LoeffelholzDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, 07743 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9495-1912
Robert PatejdlDepartment of Physiology, Health and Medical University, 99089 Erfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4587-4054
Jan SeyfferthDepartment of Gastroenterology, Helios Clinic, 99089 Erfurt, Germany.
Heinrich Volker GroesdonkDepartment of Intensive Care, Helios Clinic Erfurt, 99089 Erfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal dysfunction is common in critically ill patients and frequently compromises the delivery and tolerance of enteral nutrition. Traditional bedside markers such as gastric residual volume or nonspecific abdominal symptoms provide only limited diagnostic accuracy and often fail to capture dynamic alterations in gastrointestinal function. Gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS) has emerged as a noninvasive, bedside-applicable method that enables structural and functional assessment of the gastrointestinal tract and may support more individualized nutritional management in intensive care. This narrative review summarizes the physiology and pathophysiology of gastric emptying and intestinal transit in critically ill patients, reviews established GIUS protocols, including Gastrointestinal and Urinary Tract Sonography (GUTS), Acute Gastrointestinal Injury Ultrasound Scoring (AGIUS), the Lai protocol, and the Ultrasound Meal Accommodation Test (UMAT), and proposes pragmatic GIUS-based algorithms for enteral feeding decisions. Three clinical use cases are addressed: 8 h monitoring during ongoing enteral nutrition, preprandial assessment of feeding readiness, and once-daily screening of gastrointestinal function. Current evidence supports the clinical relevance of key sonographic parameters such as gastric antral cross-sectional area and small-bowel diameter, whereas other measures, including mucosal thickness, colonic wall thickness, and Doppler-derived resistive indices, require further validation. UMAT adds a dynamic component to static sonographic assessment and may improve the evaluation of gastric accommodation and emptying in selected patients. Structured GIUS protocols offer a promising, evidence-informed extension of bedside assessment for enteral nutrition management in the intensive care unit. However, the available literature remains heterogeneous and is largely based on physiological studies, observational cohorts, and expert consensus. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate cutoff values, training standards, and outcome effects before GIUS-based algorithms can be adopted as stand-alone decision tools.

Indexed as

enteral nutritionfeeding decisionGIUS

Identifiers

PMID42506102
PMCPMC13412792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.