ReviewNeurology international2026
Headache as a Sentinel Signal After Cranial Radiotherapy: A Symptom-Driven Approach to Pathophysiology and Management.
Review in Neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Headache is a frequent and clinically relevant symptom in patients undergoing cranial radiotherapy, most often reflecting treatment-induced structural and inflammatory changes such as cerebral edema or radiation-related brain injury. Differentiating secondary headache from primary disorders, particularly migraine, is essential for appropriate management. This review aims to examine the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying headache following cranial radiotherapy, evaluate current pharmacological and complementary treatment strategies and highlight key aspects of differential diagnosis with migraine. Unlike existing literature that focuses primarily on radiological findings of radiation injury, this review adopts a symptom-driven approach, reframing headache as a critical clinical gateway for the early detection of structural complications. A structured narrative review of the literature was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar to identify studies published between 2020 and 2025, focusing on cerebral edema, radiation-related complications, therapeutic approaches and migraine. Relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews and guidelines were included. Cerebral edema consistently emerges as the main mechanism of acute and subacute post-radiotherapy headache, whereas late-onset symptoms are most often linked to radiation necrosis. Corticosteroids remain first-line therapy, while bevacizumab has demonstrated benefit in steroid-refractory cerebral edema and radiation necrosis through inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), thereby reducing vascular permeability and attenuating peritumoral edema. Its use in the context of cranial radiotherapy requires careful consideration, as the safety of concomitant administration with radiation has not been formally established, and headache itself is among its recognized adverse effects. Evidence for complementary therapies, including
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.