ArticleJournal of Intelligence2026
Cognitive-Mathematics Relations: A Meta-Analysis of Norm-Referenced Standardized Test Batteries.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationships between cognitive abilities and mathematics skills are important to examine to help clarify how cognitive abilities promote mathematics development and inform why some individuals have difficulty acquiring mathematics skills. Meta-analyses of cognitive-mathematics relations can help summarize this research across a wide variety of test batteries and samples. This study compiled data from technical manuals of 122 norm-referenced standardized test batteries and included over 47,000 correlations from over 550 correlation matrices to summarize cognitive-mathematics relations using meta-analysis. The meta-analytic correlations were used to estimate cognitive-mathematics relations in an integrated model of cognitive abilities and mathematics skills. Fluid reasoning and comprehension-knowledge were two of the most consistent cognitive predictors of mathematics skills, and foundational mathematics skills (e.g., number sense and math fluency) were consistent predictors of advanced mathematics skills (e.g., math problem solving). A supplemental analysis examined how several narrow cognitive abilities (e.g., lexical knowledge, induction) predict mathematics skills. Results suggested that some narrow cognitive abilities, like general knowledge and general sequential reasoning, were consistent predictors of mathematics skills. This study summarizes a large amount of data from norm-referenced standardized test batteries to clarify how cognitive abilities predict mathematics skills. These results can inform both theoretical models of mathematics development and practical strategies when evaluating individuals who may have difficulty acquiring mathematics skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.