ArticleJournal of Intelligence2026
Enhancing Writing Self-Regulation and Metacognitive Awareness Through Structured Free Writing: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Drawing on research on self-regulated learning, metacognition, and cognitive aspects of writing, this study examines whether structured free writing can function as a scaffold for developing writing self-regulation, affective engagement, and genre-based performance. While free writing has traditionally been conceptualized as a creativity-enhancing or pre-writing activity, its role in fostering self-regulatory and metacognitive processes associated with intelligent performance remains underexplored. A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed with preservice teachers enrolled in a seven-week writing workshop in higher education. Quantitative data included validated measures of writing self-regulatory efficacy and attitudes toward free writing, along with analytic assessments of informative and narrative writing performance. Qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews examining participants' regulation of their writing processes. Findings indicate significant improvements in self-regulatory efficacy, more adaptive attitudes toward writing, and gains in genre-specific performance. Qualitative results further suggest that structured free writing supports metacognitive awareness, reduces writing-related anxiety, and enhances sustained cognitive engagement. By conceptualizing free writing as a mechanism for developing self-regulatory capacities underlying intelligent behavior, this study contributes to research on individual differences in learning and highlights the integration of cognitive and affective processes in academic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.