ReviewJournal of Intelligence2026
Physical Activity-Based Methodologies as a Physical Education Resource for Inhibitory Control: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of Intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical activity-based methodologies have been proposed as educational tools to improve executive functions, although their impact on early years and primary education has not yet been fully assessed. This study aims (a) to conduct a systematic review of intervention programmes applying physically active methodologies to inhibitory control in early childhood and primary education and (b) to calculate the overall effect size of intervention programmes applying physically active methodologies to inhibitory control. A systematic search was conducted in the Scopus, Web of Science, Eric and PsycINFO databases. The search yielded a total of 16 scientific articles that formed the basis of the quantitative synthesis. The meta-analysis showed a small overall effect size (g = 0.25; 95% CI [0.11; 0.39]
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.