Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42505939›Full record

ArticleJournal of Intelligence2026

Navigating the Garden Path: Evidence for Restructuring as a Shared Process.

Sarah K C Dygert, Andrew F Jarosz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Aha! Ratings as Metacognitive Judgments.Journal of Intelligence · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah K C DygertDepartment of Psychology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4958-8231
Andrew F JaroszDepartment of Psychology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8618-2770

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resolving misrepresentations is key when faced with ambiguous information. For example, problem-solvers may misrepresent the constraints of a problem, while readers may misrepresent parts of a sentence. This work investigates how a shared cognitive process might facilitate the restructuring of representations during complex tasks. Students from Mississippi State University participated in studies demonstrating that similar restructuring processes are necessary for successful creative problem-solving and garden path sentence comprehension. Experiment I demonstrated that successful creative problem-solving correlates with successful garden path sentence resolution after removing the variance of non-ambiguous sentence comprehension. Experiment II demonstrated that successful garden path sentence comprehension predicts creative problem-solving, even after controlling for working memory capacity and fluid intelligence. Furthermore, this relationship was unique to creative problem-solving, as garden path comprehension had no bearing on analytic problem-solving success. Results are taken as evidence for a shared cognitive process that aids in revising misrepresented information across certain contexts. This work provides an understanding of how individuals grapple with inconsistencies between the goals of their tasks and their representations of the world.

Indexed as

ambiguitycomprehensioncreativityproblem-solving

Identifiers

PMID42505939
PMCPMC13412464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.