ArticleJournal of Intelligence2026
Modality Matters: How Combining Handwriting and Typewriting Practice Improves Chinese Skills Performance for Chinese L2 Learning in China.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chinese language practice, especially handwriting and typewriting practice, has always been a key method for mastering Chinese in Chinese L2 learning. However, current research on blended practice modalities that combine handwriting and typewriting remains insufficient. This study used a pilot study with 30 international students to compare the associative patterns of handwriting practice and blended practice (a sequential multimodal practice wherein handwriting instruction was followed by typewriting) on students' Chinese skills performance, Chinese learning motivation, and attitude. Results indicated that students using the blended practice were associated with significantly better Chinese skills performance, as well as higher levels of motivation and more positive attitudes compared to those using only handwriting. Exploratory path analysis identified a notable direct association between practice modality and Chinese skills performance; however, the pathways through motivation and attitude were not statistically detectable. These findings suggest that Chinese language teachers may consider designing lessons that incorporate this sequential blended practice, which may support improvements in L2 Chinese performance, motivation, and attitudes. Furthermore, second language learners should actively apply this practice modality to improve their Chinese L2 learning performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.