Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42505917›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026

An Artificial Intelligence Model for ECG-Based Prediction of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Diagnosis.

Ibrahim Karabayir, Shekhar Singh, Tolga Hayit, Elsayed Z Soliman, Dalane W Kitzman, David M Herrington, Barry A Borlaug, Robert L Davis, Sanjiv Shah, Oguz Akbilgic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ibrahim KarabayirDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Shekhar SinghDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Tolga HayitDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Elsayed Z SolimanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Dalane W KitzmanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
David M HerringtonDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7670-6400
Barry A BorlaugDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Robert L DavisCenter for Biomedical Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8807-0019
Sanjiv ShahDivision of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Oguz AkbilgicDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0313-9254

Funding

ECG-AI Based Prediction and Phenotyping of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection FractionR01HL169451 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Oguz Akbilgic · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
National Heart Lung and Blood Institute R01HL169451NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL169451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for over half of all heart failure (HF) cases and remains diagnostically challenging due to nonspecific symptoms and a lack of accessible noninvasive screening tools, leading to widespread underdiagnosis and delayed treatment. The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a low-cost, widely available tool that reflects myocardial electrical remodeling. We previously developed and externally validated an ECG-based artificial intelligence (ECG-AI) model capable of classifying ECGs into four categories: reduced ejection fraction (rEF), mid-range ejection fraction (mEF), HFpEF, and controls. In this study, we evaluate the ability of this ECG-AI model to predict future HFpEF diagnosis using real-world data from a large integrated health system.

methodsWe applied the validated ECG-AI model to an independent cohort of 7713 patients from Wake Forest Baptist Health (WFBH), using one ECG per patient recorded before the clinical diagnosis of HFpEF. Model discrimination was evaluated across multiple prediction windows from six months up to ten years before diagnosis using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with comparisons performed using DeLong's test. Performance was also compared head-to-head with the H2FPEF score, a validated clinical score for HFpEF, in the subset of patients with complete data for score calculation. ECG-AI outputs were stratified into quartiles and evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for demographics and major comorbidities.

resultsOf the 7713 patients, 283 (3.7%) were subsequently diagnosed with HFpEF. The ECG-AI model achieved an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.86) using ECGs recorded within six months before diagnosis. Discrimination remained stable across prediction windows extending up to ten years before diagnosis (AUC range, 0.78-0.80; all DeLong

conclusionsAn independently validated ECG-AI model predicted incident HFpEF up to ten years before clinical diagnosis and outperformed the H2FPEF score using ECG alone, indicating that ECG-derived signatures precede clinical recognition of the syndrome. ECG-AI shows promise as a prognostic, risk-stratification tool to prioritize further evaluation; prospective validation and single-lead assessment are needed before screening or wearable deployment.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningECG-AIelectrocardiogramheart failureHFpEFrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID42505917
PMCPMC13410002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.