ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
Update in Perioperative Ischemic Workup: Integrating 2024 AHA/ACC Guidelines and Contemporary Evidence.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perioperative myocardial ischemia and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) remain prevalent contributors to postoperative morbidity and mortality. Recent advances, including high-sensitivity biomarkers and updated 2024 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines, have modified the clinical approach to preoperative ischemic evaluation. This review intends to synthesize contemporary evidence and provide a framework for perioperative ischemic workup. A narrative review of the current literature and major society guidelines was conducted, focusing on perioperative risk stratification, functional capacity assessment, biomarker utilization, noninvasive and invasive diagnostic modalities, and perioperative medical optimization strategies. Contemporary perioperative evaluation favors a stepwise, risk-based approach that uses clinical risk indices, functional capacity, and selective diagnostic testing. Biomarkers such as natriuretic peptides and cardiac troponins enhance risk prediction and enable the detection of MINS, which is strongly associated with increased mortality. Evidence does not support routine preoperative stress testing or prophylactic coronary revascularization in stable patients. Guideline-directed medical therapy, including sustained statin use and attentive management of antiplatelet and beta-blocker therapy, remains central to risk mitigation. Modern perioperative ischemic workup prioritizes individualized, evidence-based evaluation over routine testing. Integration of biomarkers, structured risk assessment, and multidisciplinary management may improve outcomes, though additional research is needed to define optimal strategies for detecting and treating MINS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.