ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
Feasibility of On-Site CT-FFR Analysis in Ruling Out In-Stent Restenosis on Cardiac PCCT.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evaluation of stents in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is still a major topic in cardiovascular imaging. Using Photon-Counting Detector CT (PCCT) may improve the assessment of coronary stents and make on-site CT-FFR analysis feasible for ruling out in-stent restenosis (ISR). In this study, patients with previous coronary stent implantation who underwent CCTA using PCCT and subsequent invasive catheter angiography (ICA) were included. Stent characteristics such as location and length were reported. CT-FFR measurements were taken 1.8 cm before and after the stent, with a value of ≤0.80 defined as hemodynamically significant under respecting the diagnostic accuracy drop in the gray zone between 0.76 and 0.80. Delta CT-FFR with a cut-off value of ≥0.06, indicating hemodynamic significance, was determined. Any ISR and interventional treatment during the following ICA was recorded. Diagnostic performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were calculated for post-stent CT-FFR and Delta CT-FFR in detecting ISR. Patients were followed up to evaluate the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) 6 months after CCTA. A total of 19 patients (5 female, 14 male, median age 69 years) were enrolled in this study. In most cases, coronary stents were located in the proximal LAD with a median stent length of 70.2 mm. Pathological CT-FFR < 0.76 distal to the stent was detected in 6 cases (31.6%), while pathological Delta CT-FFR ≥ 0.06 occurred in 14 cases (73.7%). ICA was performed in three of these patients, with ISR confirmed in two cases. These findings yield sensitivity and NPV of 100% for both post-stent CT-FFR and Delta CT-FFR for excluding ISR with a superior specificity (76.5% vs. 29.4%) and overall diagnostic accuracy (78.9% vs. 36.8%) for post-stent CT-FFR. Two patients reported a myocardial infarction in follow-up; however, neither of them was located in the territory of the stented coronary artery. This study outlines the feasibility of on-site CT-FFR analysis using PCCT in excluding ISR in coronary stents with a high diagnostic accuracy. These findings highlight the need to extend the benefits of CT-FFR analysis for non-invasive assessment of possible ISR regarding personalized risk stratification and therapy planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.