ArticleInsects2026
The Preponderance of Evidence Indicates That the Eastern North American Monarch Population Has Declined in All Stages of Its Annual Cycle. Reply to Davis, A.K. Comment on "Oberhauser, K.S. Eastern North American Monarch Butterfly Conservation Needs and Opportunities: What the Science Tells Us.
Article in Insects, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Davis critiqued a recent review, "Eastern North American Monarch Butterfly Conservation Needs and Opportunities: What the Science Tells Us". He argued that Eastern North American monarch numbers in the summer have not declined, despite dramatic declines in the area covered by this population in Mexico during the winter. These declines in winter numbers, he said, can be explained by increasing mortality during the fall migration and subsequent density-dependent increases the following spring. A strong impetus for these arguments appears to be Davis's concern that recommendations by "certain circles" of the monarch research community could steer conservation funding toward a species that does not need our help. Here, we address these concerns, and note that there is no evidence that conservation funding focused on providing breeding habitat for monarchs detracts from conservation for other species in need of help, or from efforts to support migrating monarchs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.