ReviewInsects2026
Sustainable Mite Management in Apple Orchards Under Climatic Stress: Ecological Trade-Offs and System Challenges.
Review in Insects, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Climate change is increasingly altering the ecological dynamics of apple orchard ecosystems, creating new challenges for sustainable management of phytophagous mites. Rising temperatures, prolonged drought periods, and increasing climatic variability influence mite population dynamics, destabilize predator-prey interactions, and reduce the effectiveness of traditional pest management approaches. This review examines sustainable mite management in apple orchards through the interconnected perspectives of ecological stability, climatic stress, and resilience-oriented agroecosystem management. Particular attention is given to the ecological mechanisms underlying mite outbreaks, including climate-driven acceleration of reproduction, trophic destabilization, biodiversity loss, and disruption of biological regulation processes. The ecological limitations of both conventional chemical control and biological control strategies are critically analyzed, highlighting issues related to pesticide-induced ecological disturbance, resistance development, climatic sensitivity of natural enemies, and operational constraints. The review further explores resilience-oriented management frameworks based on ecological intensification, habitat diversification, conservation biological control, adaptive management, and system-oriented regulation. Current research gaps are identified, including the lack of long-term ecological studies, insufficient integration of climatic and ecological datasets, limited development of resilience indicators, and underrepresentation of continental and semi-arid orchard systems. The findings suggest that future sustainable mite management should move beyond reactive pest suppression toward ecosystem-based approaches that strengthen ecological resilience and adaptive capacity under increasing climatic uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.